Zach Taft, CEO of health tech innovator Ignitedata, discusses the critical need for interoperability between Electronic Health Records (EHR) and EDC systems in clinical research. He highlights technological limitations, regulatory hurdles, and data collection variability. Despite these obstacles, advancements in standards like FHIR and emerging AI technologies facilitate data harmonization and integration. Investment in EHR to EDC technology is growing, driven by the potential to automate processes, enhance data quality, and streamline clinical trials. Future developments, including integrating unstructured data, promise to revolutionize clinical research and accelerate drug development. 

Moe: What are the challenges and market needs for interoperability between EHR and EDC systems? 

Zach Taft: The journey toward achieving seamless interoperability between EHR and EDC systems has been fraught with technological and regulatory challenges. For instance, in 2016, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) made an ambitious attempt with Yale New Haven Health System (YNHHS) to integrate EHR with EDC systems. However, the technology at that time was not mature enough to support such integration fully. By 2019, significant progress was made with the maturation of interoperability standards like FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources), which provided a more robust framework for capturing and mapping data from EHR source systems to EDC systems. Despite these advancements, many hurdles remain. 

Zach Taft, CEO of Ignitedata

A primary challenge is the wide variation in data collection methods within the same organization. This lack of standardization complicates data harmonization efforts, making it difficult to ensure consistent and accurate data transfer. Additionally, regulatory requirements for data privacy and security add another layer of complexity. However, the rise of AI and machine learning technologies offers promising solutions. These advanced technologies can help standardize and transform disparate data sets, making seamless integration more feasible. What was once a daunting task is now becoming a reality. AI and machine learning enable more efficient data harmonization and enhance interoperability between EHR and EDC systems. This progress is crucial for improving the efficiency and accuracy of clinical trials, ultimately leading to faster drug development and better patient outcomes. 

Moe: Who is investing in EHR to EDC, and why is there such interest in this technology? 

Zach Taft: Investment in EHR to EDC technology is coming from a diverse array of sectors, including private equity, venture capital, individual family practices, hospital systems, and big tech companies. This broad interest is primarily due to the untapped potential within the clinical trials and research technology space, which still largely relies on manual and outdated processes. Financial institutions and sponsors recognize the inefficiencies inherent in the current systems and see significant opportunities for innovation and improvement. Academic medical centers and tech companies are also keen to drive advancements that streamline data management, reduce errors, and enhance research capabilities. 

These investments are propelled by several vital drivers. First, there is a compelling need to reduce operational costs and resource constraints associated with manual data entry and management. Automated EHR to EDC integration can drastically cut these expenses by eliminating redundant processes. Second, improving data quality is crucial for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of clinical trial results. High-quality data reduces the risk of errors and enhances compliance with regulatory standards. Lastly, the efficiency of clinical trials can be significantly enhanced through faster data transfer and improved data fidelity, leading to quicker drug development timelines and more rapid responses to adverse events. These benefits make EHR to EDC technology a highly attractive investment, promising to revolutionize the clinical trial landscape and accelerate the development of new treatments. 

Moe: What are the core transformational benefits being delivered or anticipated by these technologies? 

Zach Taft: The primary goal of integrating advanced technologies into EDC systems is to drive economies of scale. For sites managing thousands of studies, manual data transfer is not only redundant but also extremely costly and error prone. Automating this process can significantly enhance the accuracy, efficiency, and effectiveness of clinical research coordinators (CRC), allowing them to focus on high-value tasks at the top of their training, rather than monotonous data entry. This automation streamlines operations and makes the role more rewarding, leading to higher retention rates and greater career satisfaction among research staff. Additionally, by reducing the administrative burden, sites can reallocate resources towards more critical aspects of clinical trials, ultimately improving the overall research environment. 

From a sponsor perspective, the benefits of automated data transfer are equally profound. By enabling quicker protocol deployment and ensuring higher-quality data, these technologies can reduce queries by over 90%. This dramatic improvement in data quality translates to shorter drug development timelines and enhanced trial efficiency. Sponsors can make more informed decisions faster, accelerating the path from research to market. Moreover, the data’s increased accuracy and reliability help maintain compliance with regulatory standards, thereby reducing the risk of costly delays or errors. Overall, integrating advanced EDC systems is poised to revolutionize clinical trials, making them more efficient, cost-effective, and ultimately more successful in bringing new treatments to patients. 

Moe: What are the future directions for emerging technologies to enhance EHR to EDC integration? 

Zach Taft: Due to regulatory requirements and industry standards constraints, the technology has, to date, been primarily focused on structured data – but the next frontier will certainly be integrating unstructured data for regulatory-grade submissions. Advances in large language models (LLMs) and sophisticated AI/ML solutions are paving the way for this transformation. These technologies can help convert unstructured data into a structured format that EDC systems can efficiently utilize. Today, LLMs are used in RWD/RWE data collection for research purposes, but not in data collection for regulatory submissions due to accuracy constraints and regulatory standards.  However, we anticipate significant growth in this area over the next 3-5 years, driven by collaborations between tech giants, regulators, sponsors, and research sites. These partnerships are crucial for developing and refining the technologies needed to tackle the complexities of unstructured data and enhance overall data quality. 

Improved interoperability and access to comprehensive data sets will enable faster and more accurate data rendering for researchers and sponsors. This evolution in EDC systems technology will drive unprecedented clinical trial and drug development innovation. Enhanced data integration capabilities will streamline the research process, reduce errors, and improve compliance. As these technologies mature, they will support more efficient trial designs, quicker decision-making, and better patient outcomes. The future of EDC systems is optimistic, with the potential to revolutionize our clinical research and accelerate the development of new treatments. 

Moe: Is there anything else you’d like to add, Zach? 

Zach Taft: One of the most exciting developments is the increasing collaboration between sponsors, sites, tech companies, and regulatory bodies. Historically, this ecosystem has been fragmented, which has hindered progress, innovation, and global scale. However, we now see these key stakeholders come together with a unified goal. Organizations like MSK- Clinical Research Innovation Consortium play a pivotal role in fostering these collaborations. By working together, we can accelerate the adoption of standardized technologies, streamline processes, and improve patient care. These collective efforts are breaking down silos and enabling a more integrated approach to clinical research and development. 

We anticipate more growth and innovation in clinical trials and drug development over the next five years than in the past five decades. This rapid progress is driven by the synergy between these stakeholders and technological advancements. The ultimate beneficiaries of these efforts will be the patients having greater access, global, to life-saving treatments for devastating diseases like cancer. By leveraging the combined strengths and expertise of sponsors, sites, tech companies, and regulatory bodies, we’re creating a more efficient and effective clinical trial ecosystem that holds tremendous promise for the future of healthcare around the world. 

Website | + posts

Moe Alsumidaie is Chief Editor of The Clinical Trial Vanguard. Moe holds decades of experience in the clinical trials industry. Moe also serves as Head of Research at CliniBiz and Chief Data Scientist at Annex Clinical Corporation.